Skip to main content
Start of content
Start of content

e-4758 (Citizenship and immigration)

E-petition
Initiated by Maria Kartasheva from Ottawa, Ontario

Original language of petition: English

Petition to the Government of Canada

Whereas:
  • The current process for evaluating immigration and citizenship applications unfairly places the burden on those facing political persecution to prove that foreign laws they're accused of violating aren't crimes in Canada, and this places undue stress to those who have suffered under autocratic regimes;
  • We propose an official list that automatically disqualifies political laws as valid reasons for denying refuge, humanitarian or other visas, or Canadian citizenship;
  • Autocratic regimes craft laws, for the purpose of political persecution, that look just to those unfamiliar with their political context, for example, in the Russian Federation, Articles 207.3, 280.3, and 284.2 were added to the Criminal Code after the Ukraine invasion to suppress truth about the war and persecute dissenters;
  • Implementing this list would streamline Immigration, Refugees, and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) reviews, expediting applications for those persecuted under these laws, and preventing delays for those wrongly perceived as criminals; and
  • Political context for understanding these laws as political prosecution, not crimes, can be provided by the Canadian Ministry of Global Affairs, they already use this information to sanction regimes for human rights violations.
We, the undersigned, citizens and residents of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to establish a pre-approved list of laws used for political persecution that don’t have an equivalent in Canada, for the purpose of fast-tracking the evaluation of immigration and citizenship applications during the Prohibitions sections of said applications.

Response by the Minister of Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship

Signed by (Minister or Parliamentary Secretary): PAUL CHIANG, M.P.

Under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act (IRPA), a foreign national convicted of a crime outside Canada may be inadmissible to Canada. However, an immigration officer reviews all applications on a case-by-case basis prior to making a determination of whether the applicant is inadmissible. Officers examine foreign charges and convictions to determine if there is an equivalent offence in Canada for the act committed. If there is no equivalent offence, the individual would not be inadmissible for having committed or being convicted for that offence. For example, there is no equivalent offence in Canada in regards to the Russian Federation article 280.3 (“public actions aimed at discrediting the use of the armed forces of the Russian Federation”). A charge for having participated in those activities abroad would not make an individual inadmissible to Canada. In cases where there are similarities between a foreign law and a Canadian law, a person would only be found inadmissible if the underlying action is considered an offence in Canada. The current process does not place the burden on those facing political persecution to prove that foreign laws that they may have violated are not crimes in Canada. In fact, this case-by-case approach may be more beneficial for applicants versus an official list as it allows officers the flexibility to assess each candidate on their own merit.

All inadmissibility decisions are based on evidence, which may consist of police or intelligence reports, statutory declarations or other documents, such as media articles or publicly-available information. Officers consider all the specific facts and evidence presented by the applicant. Decision-makers are required to follow the rules of procedural fairness throughout the decision-making process.

In the event that an immigration officer has concerns over the criminal admissibility of an applicant, the individual is informed and given an opportunity to provide a response to concerns about their application.

Furthermore, if an officer determines that an applicant is inadmissible to come to Canada, applicants may be eligible, on a case-by-case basis, for relief mechanisms available under the IRPA. For example, a temporary resident permit may be issued, when justified in the circumstances, to allow an inadmissible foreign national to enter Canada.

Open for signature
January 17, 2024, at 4:29 p.m. (EDT)
Closed for signature
March 17, 2024, at 4:29 p.m. (EDT)
Presented to the House of Commons
Anita Vandenbeld (Ottawa West—Nepean)
April 19, 2024 (Petition No. 441-02391)
Government response tabled
May 31, 2024
Photo - Anita Vandenbeld
Ottawa West—Nepean
Liberal Caucus
Ontario